I was hoping to replace my direct 9.6 of #1 with a newsstand at a slight costâŠBeen looking for an opportunity for about 6 months. Likely not going to happen now.
You could get 9.6s for under $200 a few months agoâŠtheyâve been selling for close to $500 in recent weeks. I expect a big rush and bump in price now.
Giving UF4 and EotSV2 a run for their money!
a 9.8 sold for 1200 a few days ago, once there is official announcement, book is gonna hit 2k-3k over night. such an incredibly hard 9.8 to get. took me 3 years to find a newsstand in 9.8
Looks like 9.8s have been hovering around $1000 for the past month. A sale at $1800 even (direct edition, wtf?). Currently a 9.8 with 8 days to go with a $1000 bid (again, direct).
Nuts mines a raw 9.8 paid $50 about 4 years ago.
But if youâre paying $1800 for this book right now you either started collecting comics last month or youâre working on the movie or youâre an idiot. So much better options in the $1800 range.
Wasnât 1800, best offer taken. Was like 1200-1300
No, but it could have been a shill bid or maybe all the 9.8s were gone and the person got desperate.
Uh ohâŠlow batteryâŠ
BTW, all three of those sales were above $1400, as the next one down (not shown) was a $1399.99 sale (not a best offer).
Now you know someone is going to write how rare the 6flags freebie is which itâs not, and theyâll be a rush on those.
Iâd like to say how that came out 6 months laterâŠbut seeing as how later printings seem to rule these days due to scarcity (and not actual release date) I donât think that is a factor anymore.
I have a Six Flags copy as my readerâŠitâs pretty beat up, though. I think someone spilled slushy All over it and read it with cotton candy hands or somethingâŠ
yummm, Six Flags snacks.
Yeah, it should get extra points on grade having been through the âtrueâ six flags experienceâŠnot some nerd grabbing it and immediately stashing it with a bag and board into a long box.
Iâll have to post a pic of it and you can tell me what it is stuck to the cover!
Saw this trending tweet about Keaton/Affleck:
They mention NYT reporter Brooks Barnes as the source.
https://twitter.com/brooksbarnesNYT
He published an interview recently with DC Walter Hamada with his vision of future DC
superhero movies.
This is an interesting quote of how he future DC projects
In addition, DC Films, which is part of Warner Bros., will work with filmmakers to develop movie offshoots â TV series that will run on HBO Max and interconnect with their big-screen endeavors.
âWith every movie that weâre looking at now, we are thinking, âWhatâs the potential Max spinoff?ââ Mr. Hamada said.
In case anyone missed this article.
Um, hate to break it to ya, but that Twitter account is on par with WeGotThisCoveredâŠ
So yea, misinformation.
Thank you! I donât follow the the info flow on Twitter.
Was curious as to why the âKeatonâ keyword was trending. That twitter account popped up.
Guess they are very good at what they doâŠThey got me via twitter trending click bait.
But the NYT article is not fake news⊠I hope 
The NYT interview is an absolute mess the way they describe how they want to approach their movies with multi-universes. I want DC to succeed, but I have little faith in how the head of DC Films is explaining things.
Doesnt mean anything.