So, I’ve been reading through Legion of Super Heroes (2019) and Dream Girl looks kinda naked. I didn’t think anything of it really until I saw the Legion of Super Heroes 7B cover. I don’t see a costume, but I also don’t see nipples. I don’t know if this is normal for this character, but is it normal for a character to be this revealing on a T rated comic cover? The female form is beautiful and there is nothing wrong with it, but a certain Spider-woman cover got nixed because of a clothed apple-booty. Thank you for your time.
I’m all for naked
Even this art pictured above By Stephanie Hans was mysteriously unused
I never understood why death and guns is fine to meaninglessly portray to the masses of all ages, but nudity isn’t. That is backwards, imo.
I was expecting a picture of Beyoncé. Feel let down now.
Oh well, I’ma preorder a few copies just in case people decide to make a fuss.
I can almost make out a different shade across her skin around the neck/shoulders/just below her breasts and Around her hips…but the lack of boots (clearly can see her toes) baffles me as I don’t see any variants of her costume w/o boots of some kind. So what’s up with that?
I prefer when my comic characters are naked beyond a doubt. Why, “Tarot: Witch of the Black Rose,” is a quality comic. You can always count on that comic to have a good dose of Wiccan theology and an equal amount of nudity.
See, there’s definitely a line where the hips meet the legs…unless that’s a roll of fat…which with that body is unlikely. With the button and the feet, she’s either naked or it’s a terrible inconsistent piece of art.
How about this pic of her?
The resemblance is uncanny; very toasteresque.