False Spec Opinions

This is what I was saying on the CBSI article. These sites have a lot of power and ability to sway what people are looking for. An article can move a lot of people to to a book that has no real merit or value. FOMO is running rampant with all these options and movie/tv deals and credibility and fact checking are paramount in these conditions.

1 Like

Yup and we’ll run the news if it seems credible but it’s really up to people visiting the site to do their own due diligence when actually buying. Yes, most sites might tell people to go an issue that might turn key but I myself usually just point out the key books, never telling people to buy. That’s their own choice.

1 Like

Someone could write an article about an obscure worthless book and watch people buy it without ever fact checking.

Yup, this is why CHU always reminds people, check other resources, due your own research before buying


1 Like

Topher never forgets! First, I asked Mike when getting Comic Reader 183 signed at a show ( his first published art ) and got a wink, nod and asmile outta him! Also, the first time Hellboy copyright was noted anywhere was in issue 14. I get it, it’s just a poster and it’s obscured but that is Hellboy. It also makes sense because Hellboy was not a real character, he was a comic hero inside of the Next Men universe so his likeness should be present in the comic related material within. Look speculators, It doesn’t have to be worth more than any other book ya like but a first is a first.

We get it. You got the book to pump and sell.

No comments in 7 years = nobody gives a shit

Replying 7 years later though


what an ego


you might as well be sucking on the tits of the Beyond Wednesday guys. CBSI is dead.

get a life. touch grass.

5 Likes

:clown_face: :clown_face: :clown_face:

1 Like

ive disliked cbsi since one of there guys faked a sale on batman beyond 6 and than wrote an article about it. and than bam a 9.8 shows up on ebay same day for like 10x the normal price.

its a common problem with the “influencers” in this hobby there all grifters

4 Likes

It’s a by-the-dictionary ‘first’, but it’s not a first that collectors give much of a rat’s ass about.

2 Likes

Imagine being butt hurt for 7 years lol.

3 Likes

Wait, what are we talking about that happened seven years ago? I can barely remember what happened last week.

1 Like

Good God, seven years ago. Covid wasn’t even a thing yet and Marvel was on top of the world with Endgame making all the money in theaters.

3 Likes


mental Olympics?
so mark brooks cover was not at any point approved by dc? they had to approve it they let it go to print or its it the fact its a con variant which means practically nothing these days

1 Like

I’m sorry
what does hellboys first have to do with absolute Batman?

1 Like

Hm. Now I want Hellboy to meet Absolute Batman

I liked CBSI at one time. That was a VERY long time ago. The last straw for me was when I won one of their contests and they never sent me the comics. I emailed several times and was ghosted each time. Just a lack of respect for those who supported them. Anyone involved with that hack site can shove it where the sun don’t shine.

4 Likes

Awww come on man, no ego here! Just having a little fun. I am just telling ya what Mike said at a show. I’ll roll with that over uninformed opinions. As for CBSI, feel what you feel. Most old comic spec cites are dead. I have no idea if we are or are not but that isn’t why I write about comics. As for the SLC book, yup I know about it and it’s a program and a prototype, very similar to the Dime Press nonsense. I am a Hellboy collector so I would want both but they are not firsts. Awesome book but not Hellboy’s first comic appearance!

BTW, the first Hellboy copyright in any comic is in issue 14. There’s really no way around this.

1 Like

It was not officially an Animated Batman Variant. Sheesh, the regular cover for 5 is a homage just not an animated variant.

Well I now see it marked up at cons all the time. Fact is no one knew about it. I don’t really care what it’s worth. Fact and value rarely align.