Same as the regular cover. Sellers lying to get sales.
2 Likes
Same lies happened with a Moon Knight comic being a supposed Walmart variant.
2 Likes
jay will get powers, i assume he will either become jonās sidekick/lover or villain/ex
I thought about this too but the more I watch Superman and Lois from CW, it made me gain interest in reading a Superman title. Here comes Son of Kal-el which was a good starting point - not for a Clark Kent story, but a Superman title - and itās very good so far imo. I might branch out and read the Rebirth ones.
So what actually will make it a āsecond printing?ā Vs. just another variant?
I
So bizarre since FOC has yet to happen. So theyāre going to stop the pressā¦.change out the adds, the. Start it up again?
If it has the same contents inside the cover (adds and what not) It feels like itās just a variant. They can call it a second print if they want, I suppose. They can call it a billionth printā¦
Either way this is the book that may sneak up on people.
Dropping my cover Aās. Putting in for this one.
Note that Previews doesnāt call it a 2nd print.
TFAW calls it Cover C and has a picture.
Misinformation from printwatch?
1 Like
diamond originally called it a 2nd print, but changed it in a few hours
1 Like
I think the print watch was early to report before previews changed it to Cover C. But I could see it as definitely a Cover C based on its trade dress when Tom Taylor broke the news alongside the cover reveal of C.
Shouldnāt it be called a biprinting? 
You have a good point if it is released the same day how is it a second printing. Cover B is not a second printing. Cover C might end up having the most value out of all the printings.
Itād be such a great cover if they actually let them kiss.
Even better, if they went all Harley/Ivy eat bang kill. Thatād get some attention!
As it is itās quite lame. Wusses.
Maybe in the actual second printing when DC realizes they can make more money.
1 Like
we will get 2nd prints of #2 and #5
1 Like
My concern is that Jon Kent isnāt younger, closer to 11 or 12ā¦ I mean 17 to 18 years old is the incorrect age for him as he was aged up for stupid reasonsā¦ So yeah can we get 10 year old Jon again? I donāt care heās bisexual, NO ONE SHOULD BECAUSE THAT IS NOT THE PROBLEM! THE PROBLEM IS THAT HE IS NOT 10 YEARS OLD! Donāt you all see?! This is all a smoke screen, to make us ALL forget heās meant to be 10 years old and youāre all drinking the Kool-Aid and NOT focusing on the BIGGER issue!
Age is imaginary in the comic fictional world. In this series, clearly heās older. Our reality doesnāt align with the stories told within the pages.
And yet he was artificially aged up for stupid reasons. Just sayingā¦ He should look like a 10 year old and actually ACT like a 10 year old. I mean doesnāt matter how GOOD this little ādiversionā of a change for him isā¦ fact remains, if Billy Batson can be 10 to 14, why canāt Jon? Because the simple fact of the matter is, it was done as a way to get Clark to reveal heās Superman, and with ZERO thought put into it. I refuse to acknowledge stupid reasonings because they are detrimental to storytelling. Jon Kent is meant to be 10 years old and this ENTIRE argument that people have been getting into over him being bisexual, is quite literally stupid. Why? Because NO ONE has brought up the fact itās actually damned sick for DC to pull when heās meant to be 10 years old. If they were smart they would de-age his boyfriend to 10 years old too
His dad is also from a planet called Krypton and they can fly, bullets bounce off themā¦ but you know, they canāt tell a story with him being obviously a bit olderā¦ thatās not logical! 
Did you sign up just to stir the pot? Welcome to the forums, but tone it down, itās all make belief and fictional. No reason to get your undies all knotted up over.
1 Like
Heās not 10 because you say heās not? Come onā¦ spare us this nonsense!
Back on the actual topic. If youāre here to just blow hot air, this is not the time or place! First verbal warning. Thanks.